AI risk & compliance intelligence

The platformto know

Regulatory exposure is not a checklist. It is an optimisation problem. Know the business. Debate the trade offs. Work the scenario you can fund.

Core capability

Agentic scenario generation.
Ranked by our math model.

Specialist agents propose remediation and compliance scenarios from how the business actually runs. Our proprietary engine then ranks that space against hard limits and returns the efficient frontier. Agents expand the option set. The model keeps every outcome defensible.

01

Regulatory frameworks

Obligations, deadlines and evidentiary thresholds encoded as hard constraints, not checklist items.

02

Business limits

Budget envelopes, headcount, delivery capacity and risk appetite bound every scenario the engine proposes.

03

Scenario conditions

Enforcement timing, market entry, vendor change, model retirement. Tested as conditions, not assumptions.

Use case · BDM

A junior BDM you can
ask for hypotheses.

Ask it to generate hypotheses, it will debate them against your limits, and it will hand you a set of scenarios you can work. Agents expand the option set. Constraints keep every outcome feasible.

01 Ask

Put a question to a junior BDM: what to treat this cycle, where spend is leaking, which vendors stay.

02 Hypothesise

Agents generate competing explanations and action sets from how the business actually runs.

03 Debate

Each hypothesis is stress tested under budget, residual risk, enforcement timing, and hard policy gates.

04 Work the scenarios

You get a shortlist of feasible plans. Send the one you pick into ticketing.

> bdm.ask(
    "What should we treat this cycle?"
  )
Analysing spend, obligations,
and residual risk you will carry...
How it works

Five steps from knowing the business
to a defensible decision.

Know the limits. Generate the options. Work the scenario you can fund.

introspect.ts
1introspect.know({
2  spend: 'budget envelope',
3  obligations: 'must do',
4  appetite: 'residual risk'
5})
Ready
Integrations

Connect the systems that already
hold your work and your estate.

After Decide, send the selected remediation plan into your connected ticketing system as tasks, with project selection and status that can track back against the plan. Available now: Jira, Vanta, Prefactor, cloud estate, and identity.

Jira
BETA
Ticketing
Vanta
Soon
GRC & assurance
Prefactor
Soon
GRC & assurance
Linear
Soon
Ticketing
Asana
Soon
Ticketing
ServiceNow
Soon
Ticketing
Azure DevOps
Soon
Ticketing
GitHub
Soon
Ticketing
GitLab
Soon
Ticketing
ClickUp
Soon
Ticketing
Zendesk
Soon
Ticketing
Drata
Soon
GRC & assurance
Secureframe
Soon
GRC & assurance
OneTrust
Soon
GRC & assurance
Sprinto
Soon
GRC & assurance
Scrut
Soon
GRC & assurance
Jira
BETA
Ticketing
Vanta
Soon
GRC & assurance
Prefactor
Soon
GRC & assurance
Linear
Soon
Ticketing
Asana
Soon
Ticketing
ServiceNow
Soon
Ticketing
Azure DevOps
Soon
Ticketing
GitHub
Soon
Ticketing
GitLab
Soon
Ticketing
ClickUp
Soon
Ticketing
Zendesk
Soon
Ticketing
Drata
Soon
GRC & assurance
Secureframe
Soon
GRC & assurance
OneTrust
Soon
GRC & assurance
Sprinto
Soon
GRC & assurance
Scrut
Soon
GRC & assurance
AWS
BETA
Cloud estate
Microsoft Azure
BETA
Cloud estate
Google Cloud
BETA
Cloud estate
Okta
BETA
Identity & workspace
Microsoft Entra ID
BETA
Identity & workspace
Google Workspace
BETA
Identity & workspace
Atlassian
BETA
Identity & workspace
Notion
BETA
Identity & workspace
AWS
BETA
Cloud estate
Microsoft Azure
BETA
Cloud estate
Google Cloud
BETA
Cloud estate
Okta
BETA
Identity & workspace
Microsoft Entra ID
BETA
Identity & workspace
Google Workspace
BETA
Identity & workspace
Atlassian
BETA
Identity & workspace
Notion
BETA
Identity & workspace

Logos and product names identify third-party products for illustration only. They are not endorsements or partnership claims. Availability depends on your environment and each provider's linking flow. GRC platforms are adjacent stack options, for example evidence programs or agent evaluation, not a certification of interoperability with every vendor feature.

The problem we solve
01 / 03

Today's tools tell you what is wrong. They cannot tell you what to do about it.

Audit platforms produce findings. Governance suites produce registers. Both stop at the point where the real decision begins: what to fund, what to defer, and what residual risk you are prepared to carry.

Best · fund now

£1.2m · residual 6% · Q2

Decision previews are illustrative demo UI, not customer data

EU AI ActNIST AI RMFISO/IEC 42001Budget envelopesResidual riskEnforcement timingDelivery capacityRisk appetite
EU AI ActNIST AI RMFISO/IEC 42001Budget envelopesResidual riskEnforcement timingDelivery capacityRisk appetite
Use cases

Start with a junior BDM.
Sector playbooks follow.

Ask Introspect to generate hypotheses, debate them, and work the scenarios it returns. BDM is available now. Healthcare and Legal use the same loop and are coming soon.

In Beta
01

BDM

A junior business decision maker for AI risk. Ask it to generate hypotheses, it will debate them against your limits, and it will hand you scenarios you can work.

  • Remediation this cycle
  • Cloud cost versus risk
  • Asset treatment queue
Read the use case
Coming soon
02

Healthcare

The same ask, debate, and scenario loop for clinical, patient, and care AI obligations. Coming soon.

  • Clinical AI exposure
  • Patient workflow risk
  • Care system obligations
Coming soon
03

Legal

Counsel, privilege, and matter workflows for AI exposure, on the same engine. Coming soon.

  • Counsel workflows
  • Privilege bounds
  • Matter exposure

Sector playbooks for clinical, patient, and counsel workflows will follow the same ask, debate, and scenario loop. BDM is available now.

Conversations

Interested in
Introspect?

Investors, partners, and risk teams. Tell us a little. We will follow up.

  • Product walkthroughs for diligence and partnership
  • Partnership and pilot discussions for B2B teams

Prefer email? partners@introspect.cloud

Message